Greatest motivators for decisions are greed, fear and laziness. – Edward De Bono

No one needs case studies with decisions taken to satisfy one’s greed.  History is replete with such decisions. Casinos would go out of business if there is no such thing as greed.

Fear coming in the way of rational thinking is also understandable. Either we take some actions out of fear or freeze and do nothing out of fear.

Staying in a relationship (that deteriorates by the day) for fear of the alternative – comes to my mind as a good example.

Continue reading »

Once in a while I used to travel back in time. This time I went back to the time when I was six years old and wondered back then what I liked most.  Not my toys, not my friends, definitely not my elementary school but my time with my mom. I remembered the bedtime stories she narrated while putting me to sleep.
Continue reading »

This week I read an interesting article titled “Jailhouse Cop” in Newsweek. It was about a sheriff who locked himself voluntarily in a cell for a week, just to know what it feels like to be in jail. As it appears Mark Curran, the sheriff of Lake County, Illinois is a devout catholic, a soft-hearted man who talks about love, religion and the importance of family in building a crime free society.


Some may see his voluntary incarceration as just another publicity stunt from a politician and I too am leaning towards that view, though I would love to be wrong. He himself admits he could not have drawn the attention of a major publication like Newsweek about the appalling conditions prevailing in the prison had it not been for his strange act.  That, conditions in the prison are dreadful and good parenting goes a long way in rearing law abiding citizens, is known for long. So what’s new here? While he has initiated commendable projects like ‘Malachi’ for the benefit of prison inmates, my focus is on this particular act. 

I don’t know if he had laid himself some specific objectives to achieve before confining himself in a cell. If so, has he achieved them? But whatever it be, he has put himself in harm’s way by being in the midst of prison inmates, some of whom may be violent. Or some who are mentally disturbed may overwhelm him to relieve their pent up feelings. Remember, he is there as a ‘prisoner’ and he cannot carry any means to protect him should someone ‘take a swing at him’ as he puts it. Even if he takes the swing, will his love or sympathy for the prisoners be the same after an attack?

Bottom line is, he is a good man but with a troubled conscience (and God only knows what it is that troubles him) which he tried to clear some way. This leads us to the inevitable question, “What can a single individual do to cure a disease or remove a curse that afflicts our society at large?”

For this, in my opinion, Wallace D Whittle has the definitive answer. To quote him verbatim,

” Things are not brought into being by thinking about their opposites. Health is never to be attained by studying disease and thinking about disease; righteousness is not to be promoted by studying sin and thinking about sin; ……
Medicine as a science of disease has increased disease; religion as a science of sin has promoted sin, and economics as a study of poverty will fill the world with wretchedness and want.
…..
True, there may be a good many things in existing conditions which are disagreeable, but what is the use of studying them when they are certainly passing away and when the study of them only tends to slow their passing and keep them with us? Why give time and attention to things which are being removed by evolutionary growth, when you can hasten their removal only by promoting the evolutionary growth as far as your part of it goes?
No matter how horrible in seeming may be the conditions in certain countries, sections, or places, you waste your time and destroy your own chances by dwelling on them.”


If this sounds too religious to you, you may want to take the view of US Marshal Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones in the movie ‘The Fugitive’) who wouldn’t let go the ‘prisoner on the run’ (Harrison Ford) while confronting him face to face. Though he may choose to believe Harrison Ford is wrongfully accused, he prefers to arrest him and take him back to prison. When he says, “I don’t care” he works in the capacity of a police officer.

I quite remember the day I took possession of  the mighty weapon in my hand. Before your imagination runs wild, let me interrupt to say that, I meant the TV remote control. Till such time I was introduced to this technological wonder of that time, I used to grudgingly get up and change channels. Then came this wonder. Thanks to it I changed channels at will without so much as lifting my hand and pointing it towards the screen. I could not help myself saying, “How cool is that”


In my college days our group were doing a project on industrial automation and I was on home turf building the circuitry using hydraulic cylinders, limit switches, cables and other mechanical parts etc. Because each component of the system was somehow  physically connected to the other and it was easy to put a trace on the circuitry, and so was a no-brainer to figure things out. But while our project worked, it looked so mundane compared to others using radio controlled devices, photo sensors etc and hence were perceived to be “so cool.”

Before cable TV came to our neighborhood, every time we moved our residence, three of us were required to ensure proper reception of TV signals. Myself on the terrace assembling the aluminum tubes on a frame, fiddling with it and pointing towards the TV transmission tower, my son on the ground giving me a thumbs up or thumbs down depending on whether my wife can see moving images(crisp and clear) on the screen inside the house.  Though I understood very little of the  technology behind transmission and reception of TV signals then,  I considered myself to be “high tech”, simply because I could get TV signals in my home.

As the years went by I noticed that some kind of a cult status is accorded to even a lowly technician who troubleshoots such a simple thing as a TV remote control, not to speak of fixing wireless keyboard or mouse, wireless networking, Satellite TV.  And I wondered, is it because in such things, much of what happens is invisible and behind the screen?

I am sure there are customers like me who would expect and gladly pay top dollar to have such things fixed and remain content to say to ourselves “How cool is that” every time a new toy works in the wireless world. I have always been fascinated by ‘wireless technology’ but was either too busy or too timid to venture into unknown territory. And have I missed the bus in the ‘wireless world’?


But you don’t have to despair like me. With the mighty Internet at your command, there are thousands of web sites that can teach you or point you in the right direction to learn all that you want to learn about wireless technology. For a start you may want to visit www.howstuffworks.com and type in ‘radio or wireless transmission’ and move on from there.

In the Internet world, if you can type, you can learn. How cool is that?

Recently I was reading an article in Toronto Star about our weaning faith in human ingenuity. For a moment, fear and disappointment froze me and put me out of action. But I recovered soon enough to realize that our faith in human ingenuity may be in short supply, but there is no short supply of human ingenuity.

The article quotes Nouriel Roubini, the distinguished professor of Economics at Harvard University as having said in his web site “One cannot rule out a systematic collapse and a global depression.”

That’s one hell of a depressing remark. What makes it eerie is that his prediction about global economic meltdown in the year 2006 has come to pass very accurately. So much so that governments all over, seek an appointment with him to take his counsel in these turbulent times. 


He goes further to say that the way the economy moving, its state would be even worse than what he has predicted 2 years ago. But of course Mr. Roubini has admitted that he is a confirmed pessimist. He says he came to this conclusion after extensive research and analysis of the then available data and trends.

But I am a born optimist. I don’t have the qualifications, experience, or reach of Mr. Roubini but my strong sense of intuition says that the world will overcome its difficulties and emerge stronger.  Apart from my intuition, I also put trust in creativity of humanity as a whole to solve problems of this size.
And I would like to quote Edward De Bono in his book ‘Serious Creativity’, in support of my trust. 

When he talks about the need for creativity he says,
” …. whenever we look at the world we are only too ready to see the world in terms of our existing patterns … That is what makes perception so powerful and so useful. We can recognize most situations. This is also why the analysis of information will not yield new ideas. The brain can only see what it is prepared to see (existing patterns). So when we analyze data we can only pick out the idea we already have.”

We should not stand paralyzed with fear or self pity or resist what is happening.  I am forced to repeat the trite saying, “We do what we have got to do.” The following story makes this point very clearly.

Courtesy driver Douglas Prasher at one of the Toyota dealerships in Huntsville was once a research scientist who collected jelly fish for its strange glow. During the course of his research he isolated and copied the gene responsible for its strange glow. He believed that this property could be used to highlight molecular functions that are otherwise invisible.


As fate would have it, his research grant ran out, with NASA slashing his funding. With mounting bills to be paid, he did what he thought was the sensible thing to do. He took a job as a courtesy driver so that he can make some promising business contacts.

But he also did the noblest thing in my opinion, in turning over the gene he isolated, to this year’s Nobel Laureates in Chemistry, Chalfie, and Tsien for further research. At a news conference in San Diego after winning the award, Tsien said Phrasher’s work made the research that led to the Nobel Prize possible.
Imagine being left out of the team that went on to win the Nobel Prize. But this doesn’t bother Phrasher one bit. Remember he faced his Great Depression in his life at one point. But still he did what he had to do.

If every one of us like Phrasher goes with the tide doing what best one can do, instead trying to swim against it, there will be abundance of opportunity.

The point is our resourcefulness is not in short supply.

The world will survive and prosper provided greed doesn’t interfere once again.

Up front I must be honest with you. While the rest of this article is mine, the title of this post belongs to my friend and colleague at my office. While we were discussing about corporate scandals, he said that he cannot state with any level of certainty that God exists. But he knew for sure that evil starts with complacency. 

Reflecting on what he said about corporate scandals I tend to agree with him. Today we have reached a situation where we treat the venerable financial statements as myths and start to wonder how much of them are true.


At any of the following stages in the evolution of a corporate scandal, person or persons involved could have blown the whistle and let the investing public and authorities concerned know that something is amiss and needs some review/investigation.
But they prefer to remain complacent and do nothing.

Stages of corporate downfall:

  1. Idea being conceived in the brain storming sessions of corporate ‘smarts’ (Example: Morgan Chase thought of offloading the risk from their balance sheet to banks as assets or Enron conceived the idea of selling Energy as a commodity)
  2. Plan executed with finesse in total secrecy and promoted as the next big thing.
  3. Investors being led to believe that it is a now or never opportunity. ( Example: banks/insurance companies/pension funds vie with each other to carry the risk offloaded by investment banks as assets on their balance sheets)
  4. Top executives show spectacular results from quarter to quarter and award themselves impressive cash bonuses or stock options in so far the going is good.
  5. Employees tend to believe and go with whatever good news management doles out to them. They show their enthusiasm by enhancing their contribution to the 401(K) plans
  6. Auditors (both internal and external) certify that to the ‘best of their knowledge’ the statements presented to them are true and accurate. (Arthur Andersen did an excellent job in certifying Enron’s financial statements. I wonder who the auditors of Nortel Networks were. Thanks to them restating of financial statements became fashionable.)
  7. News media/ investment analysts gobble up stories presented by the management of such ‘excellent’ companies and award ranks for ‘performance’. (One notable exception being the story ‘how exactly Enron gets its revenue? in Fortune Magazine.
  8. A year or two goes by and then word slowly gets around that things are not as rosy as they are painted out to be. Top executives manage to get themselves fired with excellent severance pay.
  9. Stock prices nose dive. Since the top executives have already been safely bailed out, it is now time for the government to work out the bail out details of the corporation.
  10. Finally employees and investing public are left holding the bag not knowing what to do next.



I am sure in any of the above stages there are a few honest souls with a troubled conscience who would only be too relieved to blow the whistle. But they would have been restrained from doing so for fear of consequences.

I think in the Internet age it is not difficult to post anonymously about things going wrong in the corporate world. Even if this is considered to be too risky, they can give notice about failing entities in a circuitous (hush-hush) fashion giving appropriate clues for the readers to solve the puzzle.

My sincere request for the people ‘in the know’ is to speak up before it is too late.

I intend to visit Brazil for vacation before my retirement. That begs two questions to be answered: 

1. Why Brazil?

2. Why not after retirement?

The answer to the first: I think of its beautiful carnival dancers in bikinis and Brazil’s breathtaking beaches to soak in.

To answer the second: Please see the answer to the first.


But I didn’t realize that until recently (mid 1990s) the crime rate in Brazil was very high. Watching the movie City of God changed my view of the country. If it is not safe enough for the local residents, how would it be for the visiting tourists? I am sure you will agree that it is not a good idea to get shot and come back in a coffin after a memorable vacation. Imagine you won’t be around to answer the question, “How was your vacation?”

I am not exaggerating. Some of us Canadians had that privilege extended to us as part of the package tour, when we visited Mexico three/four years ago. To this day, they are investigating the cases to figure out the answer to the classic / cliché question, “who dun it?” When Mexico tourism promotes itself as “Mexico, beyond your expectation,” it is probably true to its words.

Meanwhile it is reassuring to note (as this article points out) that Brazil’s crime rate has fallen considerably. Hopefully by that time I visit, it has fallen so low, that it will be like I am in my city Toronto. Apart from the deliberate actions of the community of Brazil, its police and change in demographics, I think one other reason for the fall in crime rate could be its rising middle class and Brazil’s improving economy.

Some of my readers who have firsthand experience may contradict whatever I said here. Before I could agree/disagree with them I want to find out for myself. An unexplored life is not worth living, what do you say?

We take it for granted our ability to think. Often it happens unconsciously i.e. we don’t even know that we are doing it until we bring it into focus (like when we breathe). As much as it is a blessing it turns into a curse if done unconsciously.If we inspect our thoughts, too many of them are repetitive and destructive. We brood over our lack of resources, past failures, betrayals, missed opportunities, etc. They only generate a sense of self- pity, anger, jealousy etc with nothing constructive coming out of them.  I am sure you would have read enough literature on similar lines, so I don’t want to repeat what you know already.

The purpose of this post is to remind you (also remind myself) to be cheerful, look for possibilities when presented with a problem, solve it in a creative way and become wiser. What better way to learn to appreciate our ability to think, then to watch an animal which is endowed with even lesser faculties than we have, that goes about solving problems.

Recently I saw a video clip (see below and click on play) in which a chimpanzee does a courier job. Let me admit that I don’t know the Japanese language as well as the purpose of this experiment (if I can call it as one) as all the commentary of the events is in that language. However as we see the clip; we can get a feel of the situation, draw conclusions and we won’t be far off the mark.


Here is my interpretation of the events:

Pan fails to notice how the package (lunchbox) is tied on the carrier (James in our case) for safe delivery
Still it takes its job seriously and later it makes it up by its persistence. It didn’t come back with some lame excuses for a failed mission.
When coming to an intersection, it decides to go one way after some deliberation. May be it had drawn from past experience or intuition. I don’t know which one. The point is it didn’t choose to remain stuck in one situation.
When it was time to cross the stream or creek, (a very complex operation for its intelligence) Pan chooses to pause and think for a minute and evaluate the risks involved. It chooses a course of action that minimizes the risks for everyone involved (James in this case).
Every step of the way Pan gives its due attention (and not lost in its thoughts about its past or future)
When it was sure that James could jump the last 1 meter, it uses all its persuasion (force in this case). I am sure Pan would have used other methods to persuade James if it can communicate with it (James). 
Finally Pan takes pride for a job well done (no matter how trivial or menial and not giving itself to thoughts of self-pity like “why me?”).

Incidentally did you notice that it didn’t miss to have fun while doing its job.
P.S. Those of my readers who know Japanese language if you could enlighten me/us about the actual experiment and commentary of events as they happen, I will be very thankful.

There is an universal belief that no two persons are alike. Each one of us is unique in our physical makeup, mental abilities, personality traits, our life experience, and so on. A news article I read in National Post recently has weakened my belief that we are unique in this world. It is not my concern whether the lady Ms. Bernann McKinney was really Ms. Joyce McKinney in disguise or the former is the clone of the latter as the title of the article suggests.


But what interested me was that she paid $50,000 to clone her dead dog Booger and became a proud owner of five black puppies cloned from it. That reminded me how close we have come to reality from the science fiction movie, The Sixth Day in which Arnold Schwarzenegger starred with his clone(??!!) Do you remember in the movie there is this pet shop where ‘made to order’ pets can be picked up by their proud owners?

Well it has become a reality now and from now on, at least for those who can afford, they need never have to suffer any loss or tragedy on the demise of their pets. In one of his comedy shows the late George Carlin makes fun of pet lovers who bring home a pet and shower it with all their love and tender care. He said that they really have brought home a tragedy while they may think it to be a bundle of joy. His reasoning was that one day or the other the pet has to face its demise and that will be before its owner passes away. Sorry George, for once you are proved wrong.

Human Cloning

This story also made me wonder whether human cloning too is going on illegally somewhere on the high seas? Let us be optimistic that currently there is no large scale human cloning. I said optimistic because the unique talents that we develop as we go along, is our only insurance in this uncertain job market. Already we have enough competition and we stand even less chance if our clones start competing against us. Don’t you agree?

Talking of uniqueness, did you see Robert Muraine’s audition in the TV program ‘So you think you can dance?’ Of course the judges and the audience where blown away by the awesome performance of Bob. But one of the judges scored his performance to be so unique that he would have difficulty approving Bob to the next level of the competition. For a moment I too was thinking this young man has wasted a part of his life learning something too unique. But this time I was proved wrong.

Look at the recent IKEA commercial in which Bob replicates his success so well and I am sure he must have made a ton of money doing this commercial. As of this date no one in the world can do what Robert Muraine has done and do you understand now why I stress developing our unique talents and also why I fear my clone ?

pickupthereceiver.jpg

“Damn it. It’s him again. What do I tell him?” The guy on the right seems to be cursing himself for having picked up the receiver. Situations such as these must have prompted the invention of answering machines and call display. How convenient it is to let the caller leave his message or vent his anger while we go about our routine?

Isn’t it strange that in this age of instant communications we find it ever harder to reach the other person? Especially if that other person owes us for products delivered or services rendered. Try as we could, we never get past the secretary who would be more than willing to put us on to her elusive manager’s voice mail rather than let us know his real whereabouts. I wonder what would happen if the caller calls from his cell phone while standing right outside this customer’s office just to check if he is really there or not.

Or imagine a situation like this: You and your buddy are on the cell phones talking to each other. Unknown to each other both of you are currently in the downtown area of the city where you live. Also unknown to you, both of you are walking towards each other. You ask your friend to check the availability of a product on sale (and the sale ends today, in less than an hour) on the east end of your city. And you say (or lie) that you are in the west end shopping for the same product on sale. Your friend like you replies (or lies) that he is in the east end only and is desperately looking for the product. As soon as he finds one, he will give you call. As you come within vicinity of each other, you have found each other out (literally and figuratively).


George’s way (in one of the Seinfeld episodes) of screening incoming calls comes to my mind. Telephone answering machines have been around a long time that we get more and more creative in leaving recorded messages on our home phone / cell phone. While it is fun to watch, it will in the long run damage our reputation and ruin our relationships. In a connected world, we are alienating ourselves.

When we leave a message; the acceptable notion is that, the receiver at the other end is genuinely unavailable or busy. Or he or she is in a different time zone. But I have a suspicion that some of us are misanthropists who cannot stand humanity. How else can you explain this culture of hiding our predisposition, to communicate with the other person, pervading an always-on communication medium like MSN messenger or Yahoo messenger?

Look at some of the stock messages such applications allow us to leave:

  • Busy
  • Stepped out
  • Be right back
  • Not at my desk
  • On the phone
  • or we can get creative and type in our own message to show that we are not available at the moment.
  • Or we may even to choose to be invisible to everyone!

Look at the last entry. I believe technology came to our rescue not to serve such devious purposes. What do you think?